Case tracker
AI & Big Tech Harm Case Tracker
A sourced, human-reviewed record of lawsuits and regulatory actions over harm caused by AI systems, social media platforms, and Big Tech — chatbot failures, addictive design, child safety, biometric privacy, algorithmic denials, and more. Each case links to attorneys who handle that kind of matter.
4 cases listed · last reviewed . Every entry links to its sources — verify current status before relying on any case.
If something like one of these happened to you, you don't have to navigate it alone — open a case and use it to find and contact attorneys who handle that exact kind of harm.
Filter by harm type
Filter by status
4 cases · Copyright & training data
- Copyright & training dataRuling issuedUK ruling Nov 4, 2025
Getty Images v. Stability AI Ltd.
Stability AI "Stable Diffusion" image generator · United Kingdom (and United States)
Getty Images sued Stability AI alleging its images were scraped to train Stable Diffusion, asserting copyright, database-right, trademark and passing-off claims. In November 2025 the English High Court largely rejected the copyright claims, holding the model contains no reproductions of the works, but found limited trademark infringement where outputs reproduced the Getty watermark. A parallel U.S. case is ongoing.
- Copyright & training dataOngoingFiled Dec 27, 2023
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corp. & OpenAI
OpenAI ChatGPT / Microsoft Copilot · United States (New York)
The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft alleging unauthorized copying of millions of its articles to train GPT models, seeking damages and destruction of infringing datasets. In a 2025 ruling the court allowed core copyright claims to proceed past a motion to dismiss; the case is consolidated with related publisher suits and remains pending.
- Copyright & training dataOngoingFiled Sep 20, 2023
Authors Guild v. OpenAI, Inc.
OpenAI GPT models / ChatGPT · United States (New York)
The Authors Guild and 17 authors including George R.R. Martin, John Grisham, and Jodi Picoult filed a class action alleging their books were copied from pirate repositories to train GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 without permission. The suit claims this infringes copyright and harms authors’ livelihoods; the case is proceeding in the Southern District of New York.
- Copyright & training dataOngoingFiled Jan 13, 2023; trial set Sep 2026
Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.
Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt, Runway (image generators) · United States (California)
Artists Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz brought a class action alleging AI image generators were trained on their copyrighted works without consent. In an August 2024 ruling the court dismissed some claims but allowed direct copyright infringement, inducement, and trademark claims to proceed; trial has been set for September 2026.
Were you harmed by an AI system or a tech platform?
Describe what happened and we'll match you with attorneys who handle these cases and write a personalized outreach letter for each one — you review and send them yourself.
This tracker is an informational summary of public legal matters compiled from the sources cited on each case page. It is not legal advice and is not a complete record of any case. Verify current status with primary sources before relying on it.