Case tracker
AI & Big Tech Harm Case Tracker
A continuously updated, sourced record of lawsuits and regulatory actions over harm caused by AI systems, social media platforms, and Big Tech — chatbot failures, addictive design, child safety, biometric privacy, algorithmic denials, and more. Each case links to attorneys who handle that kind of matter.
If something like one of these happened to you, you don't have to navigate it alone — open a case and use it to find and contact attorneys who handle that exact kind of harm.
Filter by harm type
Filter by status
3 cases · Regulatory action
- Biometric privacy & facial recognitionRegulatory actionSettlement Dec 19, 2023
FTC v. Rite Aid Corporation
Rite Aid in-store facial-recognition 'AI watchlist' system · United States (federal)
The FTC alleged Rite Aid deployed facial recognition in hundreds of stores to flag suspected shoplifters without reasonable safeguards, generating thousands of false positives that led consumers to be wrongly surveilled, searched, ejected, or reported to police, with disproportionate false-positive rates in plurality-Black, Latino, and Asian communities. The 2023 settlement banned Rite Aid from using facial recognition for five years and required deletion of collected data and models.
- Data privacy & misuseRegulatory actionFine 2018; settled Oct 2019
UK ICO v. Facebook (Cambridge Analytica fine)
Meta/Facebook · United Kingdom
The UK ICO fined Facebook £500,000 (the maximum under the pre-GDPR Data Protection Act 1998) for failing to safeguard users’ personal information and for lack of transparency in connection with the Cambridge Analytica scandal. After initially appealing, Facebook agreed to pay the fine in an October 2019 settlement without admitting liability.
- Data privacy & misuseRegulatory action
Were you harmed by an AI system or a tech platform?
Describe what happened and we'll match you with attorneys who handle these cases and draft personalized outreach on your behalf.
This tracker is an informational summary of public legal matters compiled from the sources cited on each case page. It is not legal advice and is not a complete record of any case. Verify current status with primary sources before relying on it.